合同涉及的条款如下:
qte
The Recap, provides “LOADPORT: 1 SP 1 SB KALAMA OR EGT CHOPT PEGUT SOUND”. (EGT finally fixed)
Further “NOR/LAYTIME: AT LOADPORT: NOR TO BE TENDERED WITHIN OFFICE HOURS 0800-1600 HRS MON-FRI, AND 0800-11 HRS SAT. LAYTIME TO COMMENCE 0800 HRS THE NEXT WORKING DAY”.
Clause 14 of the main body of the CP dated 25 January 2013 provides “For NOR see Clause 44” and Line 90 provides that the NOR is to be accompanied by a certificate of “free of insect infestation and objectionable odours issued by a Grain Inspector…”.
Clause 44a of the Rider Clauses provides “Such Notice of Readiness shall be delivered when vessel is in the loading berth and is in all respects ready to load … . If the loading berth is unavailable, Master may tender vessel’s Notice of Readiness from a lay berth or anchorage within the commercial limits of the port subject to the provision of clause 44 paragraph c” and that “Following receipt of Notice of Readiness to load … laytime to commence at 0800 hours on the next working day …”.
Clause 44c provides “Waiting for Berth. If the vessel is prevented from entering the commercial limits of the loading … port because the first or sole loading berth or a lay berth or anchorage is not available, … and the Master warrants that the vessel is physically ready in all respects to load … the time spent waiting at a usual waiting place outside the commercial limits of the port … shall count against laytime …”, and further “Once the vessel has reached a place within the commercial limits of the port, Notice of Readiness is to be tendered in accordance with … clause 44a …”
Clause 44d provides “At the loading port Master’s Notice of Readiness shall be accompanied by a Pass of the NCB and grain inspector’s certificate of vessel’s readiness in all compartments to be loaded, for the entire cargo …”.
Unqte
目前租家依旧未将VSL DRIFTING TIME 当做LAYTIME去计算。我方曾尝试1SP LONGVIEW的装港条款去辩驳船东没有义务去靠泊第二个泊位,也曾尝试去辩证LAY BERTH 和免费的ANCHORAGE是不一样的等泊地位双方并未就这个备用泊位费用进行划分,而合同的44C条款是为了分清楚租家和船东在港口拥挤的时间损失分摊,租家不可以仅凭NORGRAIN中的印刷条款列入的LAY BERTH 就忽略了本条款真正的目的。
但明显我们的辩驳都无效果,协会替我们去和解,希望争取一些损失回来也失败了。请杨老师帮我们分析一下,如果我们去仲裁,能拿回部分损失的可能性大吗?